«

»

Jun
22

Red Light Cameras: safety or revenue source

Red light camera system at the Springfield, Oh...

Image via Wikipedia

Interesting debate playing out up in Toledo:

Toledo’s 2009 general fund budget still has a $12.5 million shortfall, and city leaders say that deficit could grow if advocates of a petition drive to ban red-light cameras are successful. Mayor Carty Finkbeiner has sought for months to balance the budget with a combination of new revenue such as a higher trash free, along with cuts, including union concessions.

The city is gambling, though, that enough drivers will run red lights at the 21 intersections where the cameras are installed to generate $2.5 million this year. Some might say the estimate is high and the city will be short come Dec. 31.

The cameras produced $1.34 million in 2008 and about $298,000 as of April 30.

But the issue is controversial, as it is in most Ohio cities:

In January, members of a Cincinnati group that in 2008 successfully fought the installation of red-light cameras there brought the fight to Toledo. Toledo was the first Midwestern city to install red-light cameras.

The group needs 9,750 valid signatures from registered voters to get the issue on the ballot in Toledo’s November general election. It hopes to collect 14,000 signatures. The deadline for the signatures to be filed with the Lucas County Board of Elections is Aug. 20.

Chris Finney, a board member of the Coalition Opposed to Additional Spending and Taxes, said the cameras are not intended to increase traffic safety but to add money to the city’s coffers.

Toledo Police Chief Mike Navarre said money is absolutely not the reason for the cameras. “I believe in the red-light camera[s] and they have been proven just by the very fact there is a drop in violations at the intersections where they are installed,” Chief Navarre said. “If less people are going through red lights, there are going to be less accidents.”

A study by Toledo police of crashes at intersections found a 20.7 percent reduction at intersections with cameras in the 2001-to-2004 period compared with the number of crashes in the period between 1996 and 2000.

What do you think?

[poll id="2"]

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

1 comment

  1. Matt N. says:

    OK so you are presumed guilty and have no right to face your accuser- and would face massive late fines for not paying while you tried, unsuccessfully, to have an appeal. Just which part of that is constitutional?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>